Recent controversies within the St. Paul American Indian
community over programs associated with St. Paul Public Schools have
led to the director of the SPPS American Indian Education program
requesting a reassignment within the district. Questions about the
future of the program continue. Among the controversies: adoption of
former director Rosemary White Shield’s proposed New Day model,
staff restructuring and criticism of how elections of the two Indian
Education Parent Committees were conducted. The recent controversies
add to ongoing criticism that Indian Ed fails to serve all Native
students adequately and that Native students continue to be affected
by the achievement gap.
Indian education programming in SPPS can be confusing and
complex. Multiple programs, two separate parent committees, reflect a
complicated history, diverse funding streams and tangled
administrative paths.
According to the SPPS Web site, the
American Indian Education Program provides services for any American
Indian students who are enrolled members of a tribe, band or other
organized group, including Alaskan Native. The program also may
provide services to any student who is a child or grandchild of an
enrolled member.
Then there’s the American Indian
Studies program, which is funded separately and provides American
Indian history and language from a Native perspective to students of
all backgrounds. It’s offered at the American Indian Magnet School
(K-8) and Harding High School.
There are two American Indian
Education parent committees – the Title VII committee and the
Johnson O’Malley committee, which are funded by two separate
federal grants. Both groups usually meet together, according to
Nicole Martin Rogers, a member of the Title VII Committee. The two
groups have different criteria for participating, with the Johnson
O’Malley committee requiring that parents have a child in the
district who is enrolled with a tribe.
Angie Thornhill, who serves as the Johnson O’Malley board chair
and is also on the Title VII parent committee, said that while Title
VII is an advisory committee, the JOM board is a governing body,
where parents decide how Indian Ed funding can be spent. Title VII,
meanwhile, “works in collaboration with district and Indian Ed,”
Thornhill said.
2014 Elections
Most all sides agree that the elections for next year’s committee
members for both committees didn’t go well.
According to Thornhill, the initial elections for the two parent
committees had to be redone, since there had been a person
misidentified on the ballot when they were first conducted in April.
A second election was held in May at a powwow at American Indian
Magnet School.
Thornhill also said the committee decided to keep the names on
the ballot that had been on it for the first election, but once the
verification process started, “almost all those names weren’t
eligible.” She said ballots were mailed out to parents and sent
home in children’s backpacks.
However, when the second elections took place at the powwow,
there were no names on the ballot. Parents had to write in names.
Parent Maggie Lorenz said, "No one knew who they were supposed
to vote for."
In a written response to a petition about complaints about White
Shield, the New Day Model and problems surrounding the recent parent
committee elections, Superintendent Valeria Silva wrote, “SPPS and
the Parent Committee are aware of the challenges many parents faced
during the nomination and voting process. While a range of
improvements is needed, the SPPS and Parent Committee believe it
should seat those candidates elected in May as committee members.”
Questions about the New Day Model
The New Day model was developed by Rosemary White Shield, who was
the director of the SPPS American Indian Education program from
October 2013 until mid-June.
According to Thornhill, White Shield’s New Day model came about
as a result of the parent committee’s resolution at the end of the
2012-13 school year, which called on the director to investigate
every grant that Indian Ed receives. “Grants have not been in
compliance for some time,” Thornhill said. “We wanted evaluation
for all of the programming.”
Thornhill also said White Shield’s first priority was to run an
audit of each grant. Previously it was, “confusing about how
everybody was paid and what job they were supposed to do,”
Thornhill said. What White Shield found was that some positions
weren’t in line with any of the grants. “They were piecemealed
together,” she said. “In order to be compliant, some positions
needed to be eliminated and new positions needed to be made.”
Thornhill said the parent committee found themselves at a
crossroads and described two choices. “We stay with how Indian Ed
was, which we knew isn’t working. Our achievement is in a downward
spiral. That’s business as usual. Or we take a chance on this model
that was presented in front of us. We decided we were going to back
that, but we didn’t ask clarifying questions.”
She was impressed that it was an actual plan and that White
Shield wanted to partner with different people in the community and
that it was open to how it would be laid out in the community. “I
can’t speak for anyone else – that’s what made me want to
support it. It wasn’t telling me what she was going to do.”
As a committee member, Martin Rogers said she voted by an email
vote (because the group wasn’t able to get quorum at meetings for a
vote) in favor of a resolution that approved White Shield’s
proposed New Day model. According to Martin Rogers, she had a “slight
degree of discomfort” in voting in favor of the resolution. “A
lot of it was vague,” she said, but “there was some pressure to
get it passed.” According to Martin Rogers, she was unaware when
she voted for the resolution that the New Day Model included
eliminating three staff positions within American Indian Ed.
According to a PowerPoint presentation
about the resolution, the Parent Committee will work with Indian Ed
and the district administration to develop and implement a
“culturally-based, student-centered” model for American Indian
students, provide culturally relevant curriculum for students of all
races, provide “culturally-responsive” trainings for teachers and
staff, improve attendance and behavior issues, provide more
culturally-based after school activities, improve communication
between the district and the Parent Committee and improve racial
identification of Indian students. The PowerPoint also outlines that
the model will “address structural and resource challenges within
the American Indian Studies program and “implement culturally
responsive evaluation plans to assess the impact and effectiveness of
Indian Education and American Indian Studies programming.”
The New Day model itself outlines that
in addition to staff development, “Job descriptions will be
adjusted to align with clearly defining roles and responsibilities as
directly congruent with the overarching outcomes of the Oshki
Giizhigad (New Day) Model,” according to a report about the model
written by White Shield and dated Jan. 1. After the committee voted
in favor of the resolution, it was passed by the school board on
April 8.
June 16 Community Meeting
At a parent and community meeting held at American Indian Magnet
School on June 16, parents, students, community members and staff
discussed issues for nearly three hours that the community wanted to
be addressed. SPPS Superintendent Valeria Silva attended and
participated in this meeting. Many of the speakers talked about
frustration with the way Indian Ed had been operated in the past year
since White Shield took leadership and expressed concern about the
staff members whose positions have been eliminated.
Stephanie Schroeder, a teacher in the American Indian Studies
program at Harding High School (which, is a separately funded magnet
program not to be confused with Indian Ed), said this past year has
been very difficult. “I feel like almost a knife was stabbed into
our family and our family was cut apart this year,” she said,
adding that two of the staff members who have left Indian Ed were
there for any student that had a problem.
Nicole Other Medicine, a social worker with Indian Ed, said that
she has “big concerns about staffing,” saying that two social
worker and one counselor position had been eliminated. “We are
understaffed,” she said. “How do we serve our children when
there’s not enough of us?”
“This is not about. ‘I don’t want to lose my job,’ this is
about what is best for the program,” Silva said. “You know me,
I’m very direct and open. It’s about what is best for the program
and what can we afford.”
In a written response to a petition by community members over
White Shield’s leadership, Silva released a response on June 13,
verifying that the district has moved forward with a staff
restructuring plan that White Shield had proposed under the New Day
model that the Parent Committee had approved. “Because personnel
matters are private information, we can’t discuss the details of any
employee’s specific situation,” Silva’s response stated.
“However, we can say that none of the program’s staff have been
terminated ("fired").” The statement goes on to say that
staff whose positions were eliminated from Indian Ed “have rights
to positions elsewhere in the district.”
Silva’s letter also addressed criticism of White Shield over a
chemical dependency grant proposal, which included curriculum that
White Shield authored. In Silva’s response to the petition, she
stated that though White Shield was the author of the curriculum
(Gifts from a Sacred Circle), she didn’t benefit
financially from it. Silva’s response also noted that “no members
of Dr. White Shield’s family benefit financially from any other
resources used by the district.”
At the June 16 meeting, Silva announced that White Shield had
asked to be reassigned to a new position, but didn’t clarify which
position that would be. White Shield was not available for comment or
interview, either before or after the meeting. [The Daily Planet
first requested an interview with White Shield on June 6. She has not
been available for an interview and on June 19, the SPPS Office of
Communications, Marketing & Development advised us that she would
not be available for at least the next few weeks.]
Besides issues surrounding the former director, the June 16
meeting also raised other issues, such as overcrowding and bullying
at American Indian Magnet School, which has 30 percent Native
students. Chief Engagement Officer Jackie Turner responded that the
school has capped enrollment for next year, and Silva promised to
address bullying concerns.
In addition, some people at the meeting said that not all
American Indian students were getting the services they needed.
Nathan Taylor, who graduated from Central High School, said his need
weren’t met because of which school he attended. After attending
American Indian Magnet School, “for the best year of my life,”
Taylor “left behind a sense of community,” when he went to
Central. “Those dollars need to provide services for all of our
children, not just children at one school,” said Laurie Harper,
whose child attends American Indian Magnet.
David Cournoyer, who serves on the Parent Committee, said that
right now, the community is “operating with handcuffs.” Speaking
to a need for a return to relationship building, he said that the
parent voice is not the first thing the district listens to. “Who
are they listening to? 22 union leaders,” he said. “They are
running the system with rule books.” Referring to another person’s
comment about how one of the staff whose position was eliminated used
to greet students at the door, he said that volunteers from the
community could be doing the same thing. “The rules are killing
us.”
At the end of the meeting, Silva said that she has asked Elona
Street-Stewart, a former school board member who is American Indian,
to help work with the district and the community to find solutions.
“I’ve asked Elona to give wisdom and help put ourselves
together,” she said.
Janice LaFloe, who facilitated the meeting with filmmaker and
community organizer Syd Beane, called for people to come forward and
speak with her after the meeting to be part of an ad-hoc committee to
guide the next steps.