CNN's Campbell Brown calls ICWA 'a ridiculous law"
Thursday, January 08 2009
Average user rating    (0 vote)

Campbell BrownCNN's Campbell Brown, commentator for the program "No Bias, No Bull", angered many in Indian Country when on Dec. 16 she commented on an doption case in Utah that involvd a Native boy. She said the adoptive parents "lost their son because the birth mother is part Native merican," noting that the boy's mother is a Leech Lake Band Ojibwe member. She said that the tribe had gone to court and ended up winning he right to take custody of the child.

Brown said, "A federal law called the Indian Child Welfare Act gives he tribe a legitimate claim." Brown added that the 1978 law was designed to keep Native American children with Native American amilies, and then said, "To me, that is a ridiculous law." rown said that ICWA "failed" the  six-month-old baby boy because he as returned to the Leech Lake Band and placed into foster care while he tribe decides on a permanent placement.

After raising questions about the blood quantum of both the birth other and son, Brown said she was outraged that the boy wouldn't be oing back to his birth mother. "He is expected to go into foster are, perhaps with other siblings already in foster care. … because he birth mother has been declared unfit," Brown said. brown ended by saying, "If there is concern in the Native American ommunity that children are being lost to the tribe through adoption because of unfit parents, then focus on strengthening your families so that your children won't be parentless."

Angry responses from Indian Country came quickly. The National Indian Child Welfare Association, one of the first Native groups to speak out gainst Brown's comments, called it media bias against Native Americans. The organization's official statement denounced CNN for its deeply flawed, "ill-informed," and "deeply offensive  rhetoric." We denounce these ignorant and exploitive comments as the lowest point of journalistic endeavor," the statement said. "The true facts of this case speak volumes, beyond the frenzied attacks of irresponsible media spokespeople."

The National Congress of American Indians and the Native American ournalists Association also slammed Brown for calling the Indian hild Welfare Act a "ridiculous" law. The organizations called Brown's omments "ignorant," "inaccurate," and "negative." rown defended herself in an e-mail to Indian Country Today, writing, There is no bias here against Native Americans. This is about a pecific incident, a specific law and how it is being applied in this ase. I am certainly happy to review anything that demonstrates to me hat this family was treated fairly, and how this little boy could ossibly be better off in foster care."



Letter from Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe in response to Brown


The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe (LLBO) thanks the Larsons for taking ood care of one of our newest tribal members, Destino (Talon). ontrary to reports in the news, the baby known as Talon in Utah was ever adopted by the Larsons.  In fact, the adoption proceedings were ot initiated in Utah until a month after the LLBO Tribal Court issued n order for pick-up and return of the baby to Minnesota under the urisdiction and custody of the Tribal Court.

It is unfortunate that Heart and Soul Adoptions failed to follow-up on he "red flag" responses the birth mother gave on their Intake uestionnaire. Heart and Soul knew a pick-up order had been issued by he Tribal Court within two (2) weeks after the baby was born. Instead f complying with the court order, Heart and Soul and the Larsons nitiated a "flawed" adoption process in Utah courts. nder Utah law, when the birth parents are  arried, both parents must ive consent to the adoption. In this case the married father never ave his consent.  It is regrettable that adoption agencies are able o prey on pregnant mothers in poverty. Worse yet is giving false opes to their paying clients, who they present with a baby, who is actually someone else's child.

The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) protects tribes, tribal members nd their children and our collective Anishinabe culture. The Band did espectfully intervene in the Larson's Utah adoption proceedings. That udge carefully reviewed the facts and evidence, as well as federal aw trumping state law, and followed the law. eart and Soul should have returned the child in June to avoid this nnecessarily long duration and consequential  attachment by the arsons. ICWA, Indians and Indian tribes are not the problem here. The eech Lake Band of Ojibwe hopes the Press media and Utah's agency icensing adoption agencies will critically examine Heart  and Soul quickly. The Band hopes that the Larsons will be provided a child that hey may legally adopt and keep. eech Lake Band of Ojibwe

Users' Comments (0)

No comment posted

Add your comment

mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2017 -
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >


bald_eagle_erectors_web_size.jpg  bsbc_ccs_online_logo.jpg
common_bonds_howard_lake_2.jpg  us_district_court_nov_tower.jpg