subscribe_today.png

 
ls_circlepaper_webbanner_r1_v01_december.jpg
fundraiserrolormelandbanner.jpg
Does Minnesota really need a new oil pipeline?
Friday, October 06 2017
 
Written by Dan Kraker/MPR News,
Average user rating    (0 vote)

Ever since Enbridge first proposed its $7 billion Line 3 project three years ago – its largest pipeline project ever – the company has touted it as a replacement project.

The Canadian company has operated its existing, 1,000-mile Line 3 for nearly 50 years. But the pipeline is corroding, which necessitates extensive and expensive maintenance, spokeswoman Jennifer Smith said.

“The best way to keep the communities and the environment safe really is to replace it,” she said. “This is a 1960s-era pipeline. We can replace it. We’ve got newer technology on our coating, it’s stronger steel, it would be thicker steel.”

However, the state Commerce Department argues the pipeline isn’t needed. A new round of public hearings for Line 3 began Sept. 26 as state regulators face the question of whether the project is necessary.

The pipeline was originally built to carry 760,000 barrels of oil a day. But the company has had to cut that nearly in half to maintain safety. The proposed new line would boost capacity back up to the original amount.

It would also cut a largely new corridor across northern Minnesota. It would track the original line’s path to Clearbrook, Minn, but then jut south toward Park Rapids, Minn., before cutting east to the Wisconsin border south of Duluth.

To read the rest of the story, see: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2017/09/26/line-3-oil-pipeline-necessity-public-hearings-begin

Users' Comments (0)

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2017 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >

****SPONSORS

bald_eagle_erectors_web_size.jpg 

bsbc_ccs_online_logo.jpgwellsfargo_72dpi.jpg

common_bonds_cathedral3.jpg

Syndicate